Moroccan Government Cracks Down on Journalists and Activists
By Aida Alami
RABAT, Morocco — As he sits in a jail cell with seven other inmates, Hicham Mansouri, an investigative journalist, worries about his colleagues on the outside.
For now, at least, they remain free.
“They
got to me as a warning to the others,” said Mr. Mansouri, referring to
other members of the Moroccan Association of Investigative Journalism.
“Moroccans should start getting concerned about what is happening in
their country. The media is more repressed.”
About
a year ago, Morocco, a monarchy that cultivates a pro-democracy image,
embarked on a campaign of intimidation against the press, arresting
journalists and activists and even deporting foreign
reporters. Mr. Mansouri’s case is one of the examples of the crackdown
on opposition independent voices that emerged after the 2011 revolutions
in the region emboldened democracy advocates.
In May, a judge sentenced Mr. Mansouri, 35, to 10 months of prison on
adultery charges in a country where sex outside marriage is illegal. He
was accused of having an affair with a married woman. Human Rights Watch
denounced the trial as politically motivated and falling “short of due process and fair trial standards.”
Critics
said Mr. Mansouri’s imprisonment illustrates the perilous state of the
news media in Morocco, one of the most stable countries in North Africa
and the Middle East and one of America’s closest allies in the war on
terrorism. King Mohammed VI took the throne
in 1999 on the death of his father. The authorities are cracking down
on journalists and opposition figures, forbidding human rights
associations to gather and threatening activists with criminal charges.
“The
conviction of Mansouri and his co-defendant is a depressing example of
so much that is wrong with Morocco’s criminal justice system,” Sarah
Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director for Human Rights
Watch, said in a statement.
In
a televised speech to Parliament a year ago, the interior minister,
Mohamed Hassad, sent a warning, accusing human rights groups of
fabricating reports to undermine the security apparatus and to
destabilize the country.
“Organizations
that operate under the false pretexts of defending human rights
continue making accusations” that are not true, he said.
The democracy advocacy group Freedom House still rates Morocco poorly and categorizes it as “not free,”
and Reporters Without Borders’ annual report ranks it 130th in terms of
press freedom, trailing such countries as South Sudan, Mauritania and
Afghanistan.
The Interior Ministry and the government’s spokesman, Mustapha Khalfi, did not respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Mansouri’s fears about his colleagues have already been borne out.
Prosecutors recently notified the president of the Moroccan Association of Investigative Journalism, Maati Monjib,
a historian, democracy advocate and frequent commentator for
international news media, that he was under investigation on charges of
“hurting the security of the state.”
“A
smear campaign and threats started against me in July 2013 after I gave
a harsh interview on Morocco to Al Jazeera,” Mr. Monjib said, sitting
in cafe in Rabat, referring to his criticism of the king for what the
government called a mistaken pardon of a Spanish pedophile,
which created an uproar in the country. “They are not so worried about
the investigations, but the critical statements I regularly make to the
press.”
A
cybersecurity activist and journalist, Karima Nadir, was interrogated
for five hours in early September as part of a defamation lawsuit filed
by the Interior Ministry in May against the Moroccan Digital Rights
Association.
The group is accused of defaming the state after a British nonprofit, Privacy International, wrote a report
based on the testimony of four Moroccans who say they were targets of
cybersurveillance by the government. Much of the report was not news. It
merely confirmed what is common knowledge throughout Morocco: The
country has been spying on Internet activists and journalists with mass
surveillance programs.
“The
association did not write the report,” Ms. Nadir said in a phone
interview. “Many companies who sell tools for cybersurveillance have
listed Morocco as their client. It is not something we made up. It is
public information anyone can easily find on Google.”
In
May, the Interior Ministry forbade the Digital Rights Association to
hold a news conference unveiling the Privacy International report, “Their Eyes on Me.”
The
report accuses the authorities of trying to plant viruses in the
computer of a journalist, Ali Anouzla, who was charged with promoting
terrorism after he wrote about Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, a
terrorist group based in northwestern Africa.
In July, when hackers exposed the clients of an Italian company called Hacking Team,
which sells computer and phone surveillance software to governments,
the Moroccan government was shown to have purchased services worth about
3 million euros, or $3.3 million.
In
2011, a French newspaper, Le Canard Enchaîné, published an
investigation revealing that Morocco had bought surveillance programs
from the French cybersurveillance company Amesys, also once used by Col.
Muammar el-Qaddafi of Libya to collect information on dissidents.
The
current president of the Digital Rights Association, Rida Benothman, a
former political prisoner once held for denouncing torture, said Morocco
was slipping into the same mind-set that had taken hold in countries
that are fighting militants. The authorities increasingly justify mass
surveillance, even if it means compromising personal freedoms, in the
interest of fighting terrorism.
“After
the gains from the Arab Spring, the state is feeling secure again, and
we can observe a return to old methods,” he said, referring to the
antigovernment demonstrations in Morocco in 2011 that led to some
democratic reforms. “While the fear of terrorism is a legitimate one, it
is dangerous to use it to control freedom.”
The Moroccan authorities are now bold enough to pursue reporters outside the country, too.
Two French journalists are being investigated
in France on charges of plotting to blackmail King Mohammed; they are
accused of demanding €2 million in exchange for not publishing a book
critical of him.
That
follows a case last year involving a mysterious hacker, “Chris
Coleman,” who started leaking emails on social media that suggested that
Moroccan intelligence agents had bribed and offered gifts and trips to
American and French journalists.
The reporters denied the allegations. But Jean Marc Manach, an investigative reporter specializing in cybersecurity, authenticated some of the leaked emails, which indicated that Morocco may have offered incentives for favorable coverage.
Another cybersurveillance specialist, Olivier Laurelli, a founder of reflets.info, a site that investigates cybersurveillance, published an invoice
that proved Morocco had bought the Eagle program from Amesys. While it
is impossible to quantify how these surveillance solutions are used — to
target criminals or to spy on the population on a large scale — Mr.
Laurelli said the number of journalists and dissidents targeted could be
an indicator.
He said he was worried about the consequences of the increase in surveillance.
“Monitoring
the actions of an entire population that in its majority is innocent is
an undesirable drift for our societies,” Mr. Laurelli said. “There are
tools that allow for targeted surveillance. Without confidentiality,
there is no freedom of expression. It is the guarantee of annihilating
all other freedoms.”
That is why the journalists and activists are fighting harder.
Mr.
Monjib, the historian, was notified of a travel ban in late August when
he landed in Casablanca on his way back from France. Other members of
the investigative journalists’ group, Samad Lach and Mohamed Essabr, are
not allowed to leave the country. While trying to get justice for
Hicham Mansouri, Mr. Monjib tries to promote civil freedoms, and when
asked if he fears the consequences of his activism, he just shrugged.
“If they want to arrest me, they know where to find me,” he said.
Read the story on the New York Times' website.
Read the story on the New York Times' website.